
Over the past 2 weeks, Bart has guided us on an enlightened journey through the contours and depths of not simply the film genre of "noir" itself, but also the parameters encompassed within the term "genre" itself.
Bart did a fantastic job conveying the structures of film noir, and utilized a fitting array of readings that discussed film noir in the context of genre itself. I think must everyone would agree he had an extremely tight grasp over the subject, and knew his noir inside and out. The discussions were engaging, and various prominent themes ran their course throughout the 2 weeks.That said... I was bored to tears the entire time. Film noir simply doesn't butter my bread, or at least the old school 1940's black and white, light and dark, smooth-talking, cigarette-gulping, mysteriously murderous members of the genre which occupied much of our viewing experience, as it should. After all, that is true film noir. The Post WWII, glass half-empty Hollywood that bottled intrigue and never let its audience get too happy.
But I just can't handle it. The dialogue is too perfect, the acting too over-the-top. I certainly appreciate the artistic camera shots and the ability to parlay a genre into a new language with which to speak through the lens, but really, once you've seen one of those guys, you've somewhat seen them all. I think this all stems from the fact that I watched the "Naked Gun" Trilogy at least 75 times a piece as a child, and thus have an appreciation for noir through parody more than anything else.
On the genre's last day of class time, and therefore its last opportunity to win me over, we got to see "Kiss Kiss, Bang Bang." It almost pulled it off.
Unlike "Naked Gun," this film is more a celebration of the noir genre than a parody of it. Certainly some aspects are poked fun of (such as the end scene in the hospital when we miraculously find all the good characters to be alive, along with Abraham Lincoln among others), but this movie for the most part follows a fairly direct detective/noir path, with a certain 21st Century twist on movie making. For one, the narrator, and main character, Harry Lockhart (Robert Downey Jr.) is completely self-aware throughout the film. Most noir films had some narration, sometimes in the form of flashbacks, but what makes Lockhart different is that instead of merely narrating, he is more having a conversation directly with the audience, complete with some stumbling, rewinding, and self-effacing humor. In this sense, he really draws the audience into the story, as he is not just speaking as much as he is speaking to YOU.
The film also utilizes a series of detective novels, which are both key to the story itself and serve in their style as part of the direction of the overall plot layout. This is obvious to the audience because of the inherent language present within the noir genre. The audience knows what to expect, and with each new reference to the novel series and its thematic structure, the audience understands the need to apply those rules to the overall film itself. In his "Questions of Genre," Steve Neale explains the importance of genre's expectations for the audience: “genres do not consist only of films; they consist also, and equally, of specific systems of expectation and hypothesis which spectators bring with them to the cinema, and which interact with films themselves during the course of the viewing process. These systems provide spectators with means of recognition and understanding. They help render films, and the elements within them, intelligible and therefore explicable"(46).
This usage of real books is coupled with the chapters within the movie being named after real detective novels from Raymond Chandler, straight out of the pulp fiction era in which film noir also blossomed. These books add to Steve Neale's concept of the "appeal for authenticity"(47). Neale calls for this appeal in many notions of noir as a manner in which the film can sow the audience into the story even further, adding a twinge of reality to the seemingly fictional story on the screen. "Kiss Kiss, Bang Bang" makes much use of this idea, with other examples such as the name-dropping of real actors for parts in the fictional movie Lockhart is prepping for.
Interestingly, Lockhart is not the true noir hero. He is not very smooth at all, in fact. The girl of his dreams, the femme fatale character named Harmony Faith Lane (Michelle Monaghan), slept with every guy in their high school except for him. His humor and wit isn’t as much ‘look at how suave I am let me get in your pants’ as it is self-serving and at times self-deprecating. His quick and sharp responses are often more for his own enjoyment than for that of his counterpart. This is due to the fact that he is not really a detective; he is merely training to be a detective, and thus learning his suaveness on the job. But as a detective, he's a moron. He throws the gun in the lake after discovering a dead body, and is basically hopeless and inept without the guiding hand of "Gay" Perry. It’s as if Perry is schooling him in the art of being a noir hero, and eventually he becomes one.
What Lockhart does not have in skills, though, especially as a fighter as witnessed in the ass-kicking he receives early on, he makes up for in toughness. As is common in noir, the main character must go through some physical toil and still come out of it. After getting his ass beat, losing a finger, and being shot in the chest, among other things, one could say Lockhart certainly took his shots and kept delivering blows.
Overall, this film was not as much a part of the noir genre as it was a celebration of its language. This is why I loved it. It didn't play into the conventions that bored me - it simply highlighted the brilliance of its technique and language. Even the title is a shout-out to the lingo of the genre. And Robert Downey Jr. could not have been more perfect for the role. That certainly didn't hurt it.
I really like how you end with, "Overall, this film was not as much a part of the noir genre as it was a celebration of its language." I completely agree. For me, "Kiss Kiss Bang Bang" brought out the most enduring aspects of film noir. Afftene wrote in her blog this week that "If anything, Kiss Kiss Bang Bang was a satirical instruction manuel to film noir." This is another way to look at it. The film had a clear grasp on the foundations of film noir, though it cannot be completely classified under this style, so I believe it is safe to say that it is a celebration of its language.
ReplyDeleteI agree with your position of Kiss Kiss Bang Bang as a celebration of film noir, one with a bigger budget that lends more entertainment value to the viewer than the other film noirs we viewed in class. It seems you appreciate the style of film noir, even in Out of the Past, but the narrative elements that turn you off. These conventions that bored a majority of our class are present, but are either shrouded in parody or self-effacement; such as perfect banter and "cigarette-gulping" (the former when Perry tells Lockhart to shut up multiple times, the latter at the LA party when an extra disgustedly walks away from Downey Jr. as he smokes by the side of the pool--hilarious). I'll admit that I also enjoyed this "celebration" of film noir, and that it catered to my perspective of the genre as a whole as an enjoyably outdated genre. I viewed films such as "Out of the Past," with films like "Kiss Kiss Bang Bang" in mind, inserting my own parodic comments that make true film noirs just as darkly hilarious as modern parodies.
ReplyDeleteAlso as an aside, you say that some aspects of film noir are poked fun of, such as the end scene "in the hospital when we miraculously find all the good characters to be alive." However, this I would say is poking fun at Hollywood studio films that send people home fulfilled after blithely escaping reality for a few hours, rather than film noir. Film noir makes people think after they leave the theater, and rarely end in happy conclusions, such as in "Chinatown." If "Kiss Kiss Bang Bang" were a true film noir instead of a modern celebration and parody of it, then Lockhart, Perry, and maybe even Harmony Faith Lane would all have been destroyed in the end.
I enjoy your explanation of how "Kiss Kiss Bang Bang" is "more of a celebration of the noir genre than a parody of it". The film clearly pokes fun at noir, but retains the general structure of the genre and, by doing so, pays homage to the genre in a humorous, but affectionate way. The film keeps the over-the-top nature of the films in the 40s and 50s (ex. cut off finger, final shoot out scene, everyone good survives etc) . Its main character stays true to your claim of celebration vs. parody. As you mention. Lockhart is incredibly "self-aware" for the entire film, but, his character arc leads him into becoming the classic 40s film noir lead, the Jonny Gossamer detective. Lockhart does play the part of the "student" in this film; Perry teaches him how to become the suave but moody, justice seeking lone-wolf detective of classic film noir. In this sense, it shows how the genre has survived and honors its impact. Though the film often takes a sarcastic and critical look towards Hollywood and society (and, occasionally, how the noir genre has negatively impacted some of the characters), it channels the quick wit and twist-and-turn style of the noir films of old, and is a great example of how entertaining that storytelling style can still be.
ReplyDeleteAs someone who's also spent the last two weeks struggling to stay awake during what's supposed to be the fun part of class, I can definitely understand where you're coming from in regards to film noir. I can very much appreciate the stylistic aspects of it; the shadows, the lighting, the way objects in a scene are used to create claustrophobia or more. I can even, in a way, appreciate the dialogue, the cookie-cutter characters: they're fun, if you remember to laugh at them, and if nothing else they're a good lesson in how not to write a story. But film noir as a genre is not one I'm quite enamored with. So, of course, "Kiss Kiss Bang Bang had to throw my preconceptions at my head." But that, I think, is for exactly the reasons you stated: the humor is self-effacing, the characters make fun of themselves, the plot is predictable and not, and the film itself never sees to lose touch with the fact that it's bordering on ridiculous, but instead of shying away from that fact it embraces it. It is, in a way, a celebration of the noir I think, just as much as it's a well-meaning jab. It shows the pros and cons, and also shows that those sames pluses and negatives can be made into something interesting, quirky, and vastly entertaining.
ReplyDeleteI really like that this was the last movie we watched as part of our film noir series. Like you, I also was not a fan of classic film noir and personally felt like the conventions of the genre restricted the potential of the films, and I was happy to see a film that was a bit more upbeat.
ReplyDeleteI feel Kiss Kiss Bang Bang takes some important elements of the genre such as the narration and the fact that Lockhart is self-aware throughout the film, and morphs them into a piece that generates a flurry of emotions during the film. (We see comedy, action and mystery all in a space of one hundred minutes).
I think that the generational gap between audiences for a typical film noir post-Great Depression obviously affected our appreciation for the film, and this plays into Neales claim about the "expectation(s) [that] spectators bring with them to the cinema". Because the filmic conventions have changed so greatly, the way film noir was shaped as a genre means that we as the audience had different expectations when we watched the movie.
I, too, have been "bored to tears" learning about a certain style of film making that is way past its time. The perfect dialogue and great witticisms are just not something that I, as a modern film viewer, find attractive in a movie. Additionally, I think you make a great point that film noir only serves as something to be parodied nowadays. Films such as Naked Gun and Kiss Kiss Bang Ban do this very well. While film noir should be respected for what it did to cinema and how it pleased its audience members back in the day, it now time to move past even the parodies of it and into a new era.
ReplyDelete